CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 11058
Install standard flashing lights
Description:
Prior Condition: Grade crossings controlled by gates, cantilever flashing lights, and audible devices
Category: Railroad grade crossings
Study: Investigating the effectiveness of safety countermeasures at highway-rail at-grade crossings using a competing risk model, Keramati et al., 2021
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 80 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.999 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.14 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | All |
Crash Severity: | All |
Roadway Types: | Not specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | Roadway/railroad grade crossing |
Intersection Geometry: | No values chosen. |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | Minimum of 5 to Maximum of 25600 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 1990 to 2018 |
Municipality: | |
State: | ND |
Country: | USA |
Type of Methodology Used: |