CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 2214
Install drowsy driving signs (drowsy driving crashes)
Description: 6 signs installed along 25 miles of road
Prior Condition: No Prior Condition(s)
Category: Signs
Study: Evaluating Safety Benefits of Drowsy Driving Signs, Schultz et al., 2008
| Star Quality Rating: |  [View score details] |
| Rating Points Total: | 45 |
| Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 0.776 |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.464 |
| Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 22.4 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | 46.4 |
| Applicability | |
|---|---|
| Crash Type: | All |
| Crash Severity: | All |
| Roadway Types: | Principal Arterial Interstate |
| Street Type: | |
| Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
| Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
| Number of Lanes Direction: | |
| Number of Lanes Comment: | |
| Crash Weather: | Not specified |
| Road Division Type: | |
| Minimum Speed Limit: | |
| Maximum Speed Limit: | |
| Speed Unit: | |
| Speed Limit Comment: | |
| Area Type: | |
| Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Traffic Volume: | |
| Time of Day: | All |
| If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
| Intersection Type: | |
| Intersection Geometry: | |
| Traffic Control: | |
| Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Major Road Volume : | |
| Average Minor Road Volume : | |
| Development Details | |
|---|---|
| Date Range of Data Used: | 1992 to 2005 |
| Municipality: | |
| State: | UT |
| Country: | |
| Type of Methodology Used: | Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes |
| Other Details | |
|---|---|
| Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
| Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Dec 01, 2009 |
| Comments: | For drowsy driving related crashes. |
