CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 2826
Flatten horizontal curve
Description:
Prior Condition: curve with smaller radius
Category: Alignment
Study: Benefit-Cost Analysis of In-Vehicle Technologies and Infrastructure Modifications as a Means to Prevent Crashes Along Curves and Shoulders, Pitale et al., 2009
| Star Quality Rating: |  [View score details] |
| Rating Points Total: | 20 |
| Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 0.33 |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.32 |
| Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 67 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | 32.1 |
| Applicability | |
|---|---|
| Crash Type: | All |
| Crash Severity: | All |
| Roadway Types: | Principal Arterial Other |
| Street Type: | |
| Minimum Number of Lanes: | 2 |
| Maximum Number of Lanes: | 2 |
| Number of Lanes Direction: | |
| Number of Lanes Comment: | |
| Crash Weather: | Not specified |
| Road Division Type: | |
| Minimum Speed Limit: | |
| Maximum Speed Limit: | |
| Speed Unit: | |
| Speed Limit Comment: | |
| Area Type: | |
| Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Traffic Volume: | |
| Time of Day: | All |
| If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
| Intersection Type: | |
| Intersection Geometry: | |
| Traffic Control: | |
| Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Major Road Volume : | |
| Average Minor Road Volume : | |
| Development Details | |
|---|---|
| Date Range of Data Used: | |
| Municipality: | |
| State: | MN |
| Country: | USA |
| Type of Methodology Used: | Simple before/after |
| Sample Size (crashes): | 2 crashes before, 3 crashes after |
| Other Details | |
|---|---|
| Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
| Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Mar 21, 2011 |
| Comments: | For 4 curves. |
