CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 3860
Install red-light cameras
Description: RLR enforcement cameras
Prior Condition: Absence of red-light cameras
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Effects of Red Light Camera Enforcement on Fatal Crashes in Large US Cities, Hu et al., 2011
| Star Quality Rating: |  [View score details] |
| Rating Points Total: | 105 |
| Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 0.76 |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | |
| Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 24 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | |
| Applicability | |
|---|---|
| Crash Type: | All |
| Crash Severity: | K (fatal) |
| Roadway Types: | Not Specified |
| Street Type: | |
| Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
| Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
| Number of Lanes Direction: | |
| Number of Lanes Comment: | |
| Crash Weather: | Not specified |
| Road Division Type: | |
| Minimum Speed Limit: | |
| Maximum Speed Limit: | |
| Speed Unit: | |
| Speed Limit Comment: | |
| Area Type: | Urban |
| Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Traffic Volume: | |
| Time of Day: | All |
| If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
| Intersection Type: | Not specified |
| Intersection Geometry: | Not specified |
| Traffic Control: | Signalized |
| Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Major Road Volume : | |
| Average Minor Road Volume : | |
| Development Details | |
|---|---|
| Date Range of Data Used: | 1992 to 2008 |
| Municipality: | |
| State: | CA,MD,AZ,IL,TX,OR,NC,OH,DC,AK,VA,CO,AL,ID,MA,NY,MI,IN |
| Country: | U.S.A. |
| Type of Methodology Used: | Regression cross-section |
| Sample Size (crashes): | 1358 crashes |
| Other Details | |
|---|---|
| Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
| Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Jun 04, 2012 |
| Comments: | This CMF applies to "fatal red-light-running crashes". |
