CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 5469
Install red-light cameras
Description: RLR enforcement cameras
Prior Condition: Signalized intersection without red-light running cameras
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Still red light for red light cameras? An update, Hoye, 2013
| Star Quality Rating: |  [View score details] |
| Rating Points Total: | 105 |
| Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 0.83 |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.076 |
| Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 17 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | 7.65 |
| Applicability | |
|---|---|
| Crash Type: | All |
| Crash Severity: | K (fatal) |
| Roadway Types: | Not specified |
| Street Type: | |
| Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
| Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
| Number of Lanes Direction: | |
| Number of Lanes Comment: | |
| Crash Weather: | Not specified |
| Road Division Type: | |
| Minimum Speed Limit: | |
| Maximum Speed Limit: | |
| Speed Unit: | |
| Speed Limit Comment: | |
| Area Type: | |
| Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Traffic Volume: | |
| Time of Day: | |
| If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
| Intersection Type: | Roadway/roadway (not interchange related) |
| Intersection Geometry: | |
| Traffic Control: | Signalized |
| Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Major Road Volume : | |
| Average Minor Road Volume : | |
| Development Details | |
|---|---|
| Date Range of Data Used: | |
| Municipality: | |
| State: | |
| Country: | |
| Type of Methodology Used: | Meta-regression |
