Study Details

Study Title: Accident Effects of Sideslope and Other Roadside Features on Two-Lane Roads

Authors: Zegeer et al.

Publication Date: 1988

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to (1) develop one or more methods for quantifying roadside hazard, (2) define factors that influence run-off-road accidents, and (3) estimate the accident benefits of various roadside improvements. Detailed traffic, accident, roadway, and roadside data were collected on 4,951 miles of two-lane rural roads in seven states. Roadside data included development and use of a pictorial seven-point roadside hazard scale, a measure of roadside recovery (clear zone) distance, field sideslope measurements, and detailed types of and lateral distances to roadside obstacles. Statistical testing was used along with log-linear modeling to determine the interactive effects of roadside and roadway features on accidents. Flatter sideslopes of 3:1 to 7:1 were found to be related to lower rates of single-vehicle accidents. However, only a 2 percent reduction in single-vehicle accidents was found for a 3:1 sideslope compared to a 2:1 sideslope. Reductions in related accidents due to general roadside improvements were found to range from 19 percent to 52 percent, depending on the amount of roadside improvement. Trees and utility poles are the roadside objects most often struck. Obstacles associated with the highest percent of severe accidents include culverts, trees, utility and light poles, bridges, rocks, and earth embankments.

Study Citation: Zegeer, C.V., D.W. Reinfurt, W.W. Hunter, J. Hummer, R. Stewart, and L. Herf. Accident Effects of Sideslope and Other Roadside Features on Two-Lane Roads. In Transportation Research Record 1195. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1988, pp. 33-47

Study Report: Download the Study Report Document


CMFs Associated With This Study

Category: Roadway

Countermeasure: Convert 12-foot lanes to 10-foot lanes

CMF CRF(%)QualityCrash TypeCrash SeverityRoadway TypeArea Type
1.02-2text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
CMF Equationtext textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
1.23-23text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
1.01-1text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
CMF Equationtext textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
1.15-15text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural

Countermeasure: Convert 12-foot lanes to 11-foot lanes

CMF CRF(%)QualityCrash TypeCrash SeverityRoadway TypeArea Type
1.01-1text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
CMF Equationtext textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
1.04-4text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
1.01-1text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
CMF Equationtext textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
1.03-3text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural

Countermeasure: Convert 12-foot lanes to 9-foot or less

CMF CRF(%)QualityCrash TypeCrash SeverityRoadway TypeArea Type
1.04-4text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
CMF Equationtext textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
1.38-38text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
1.03-3text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
CMF Equationtext textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural
1.25-25text textHead on,Run off road,Sideswipe,Single vehicleAllPrincipal Arterial OtherRural